Closing summary
The trial has been adjourned to 10.30am on Thursday after the Duke of Sussex finished giving evidence at the High Court into his legal claim against Associated Newspapers Limited.
Barrister David Sherborne, for the group of high-profile figures suing the publisher, said they were “not in a position to have anyone else ready” to give evidence on Wednesday.
Here is a summary of the day’s events:
Prince Harry has insisted he did not have a “leaky” social circle that gave stories about him to journalists at the Daily Mail and the Mail on Sunday, as he told the high court the publisher of the titles had “an obsession” with surveilling him.
Giving evidence in the high court against Associated Newspapers Led (ANL), the Duke of Sussex rejected the publisher’s claims that its journalists had secured information about him from his friends and acquaintances, rather than through unlawful means.
Prince Harry broke down and appeared to be on the verge of tears as he said his treatment has “only got worse” from Associated since his litigation began. His voice cracked as he said: “They continue to come after me. They have made my wife’s life an absolute misery, my lord.”
Antony White KC, for Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL), asked the Duke of Sussex about phone conversations he had with Rebecca English, now royal editor at the Daily Mail, during which he allegedly thanked her. Harry said he had no recollection of the calls, but that journalists were people who “we were forced to work with, we had to have some kind of relationship with them”.
Antony White KC, for Associated Newspapers Limited, claimed while cross-examining the Duke of Sussex that Harry used a Facebook profile named ‘Mr Mischief’ to contact a Mail On Sunday journalist. White was asking Harry whether he had met Charlotte Griffiths, who the barrister claimed moved in the duke’s “social circles”.
Harry said he had “never used the name Mr Mischief”, and that he had “no idea” if he had exchanged messages with Griffiths on Facebook.
The Duke of Sussex said in his written evidence that he was “really worried something bad was going to happen” when he was in a relationship with Chelsy Davy. Describing a surprise visit to Argentina by Davy, Harry said in his written evidence that he “suspected someone had been paid to reveal our plans”.
The Duke of Sussex has claimed it was “beyond cruel” to publish an article about “confidential discussions” he had after a photo of a dying Diana, Princess of Wales was published in the Italian press. In his written evidence, Harry described an article published in the Daily Mail in July 2006 as “really disgusting”, saying he was having private discussions with his brother, the now-Prince of Wales.
The Duke of Sussex said that he did not question denials of phone hacking made by Paul Dacre at the Leveson Inquiry “out of fear of retaliation”.
In his 23-page witness statement, Harry said that when he brought legal action against two other newspaper publishers, he had “no idea” that he had a claim against ANL. He continued: “As I am sure is clear, if I had known earlier then I would have acted, particularly given ANL’s treatment of Meghan and her claim against it.”
In response to a source close to the Duke of Sussex’s claim, who said Associated Newspapers Limited had used “game playing and dirty tricks” to bring forward Harry’s evidence, an Associated Newspapers spokesperson said: “Prince Harry has been in London since the weekend ready to give evidence in this case, which he launched three and half years ago. We don’t intend to dignify this briefing by the other side with any further comment.”
Read our full report on today’s evidence in court here:
Prince Harry accuses Daily Mail publisher of wanting to drive him ‘to drugs and drink’
Read more
We know this is annoying … so here is 50% off
Seeing these messages can be repetitive. We know that. (Imagine what it’s like writing them … )
But it’s also extremely important. One of the Guardian’s most valuable assets is its reader funding.
1. Reader funding means we can cover what we like. We’re not beholden to the political whims of a billionaire owner. No one can tell us what not to say or what not to report.
2. Reader funding means we don’t have to chase clicks and traffic. We’re not desperately seeking your attention for the sake of it: we pursue the stories that our editorial team deems important, and believe are worthy of your time.
3. Reader funding means we can keep our website open, allowing as many people as possible to read quality journalism from around the world – especially those who live in places where the free press is in peril.
Right now, the Guardian’s work is funded by just 2.4% of our regular readers. We know that not everyone can afford to pay for news, but if it would help to convince you to support us, we’d love to offer readers like you in Vietnam 50% off an All-access digital subscription for the first six months, until Saturday 31 January.
Prince Harry appears on the verge of tears: “Press have made my wife’s life an absolute misery”
Michael Savage
A poignant moment in court as Prince Harry breaks down and appears on the verge of tears, as he says his treatment has “only got worse” from Associated since his litigation began.
His voice cracks as he says: “They continue to come after me. They have made my wife’s life an absolute misery, my lord.”
Antony White KC, for Associated Newspapers Limited, has finished questioning the Duke of Sussex in cross-examination.
David Sherborne, for Harry and the six others bringing legal action against the Daily Mail publisher, is now asking the duke questions in his re-examination.
The Duke of Sussex said he only learnt of the campaign group Hacked Off “in the last four or five years”.
Replying to questions by Antony White KC, for Associated Newspapers Limited, Harry said: “I happen to think they do fantastic work, Mr White.”
White replied: “I am pleased to hear it.”
The barrister also said that if Harry wanted to inquire about the 14 articles complained of in the case, “an obvious inquiry or port of inquiry would have been Hacked Off to see what support they could give you”.
Harry replied that he didn’t think “that would have been acceptable or even an option” due to being part of the royal family.
The Duke of Sussex has returned to the witness box as the trial of his legal action against Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL) resumed after the lunch adjournment, PA reports.
We will continue to bring you all the latest news lines. Stay tuned.
Harry: I didn’t dare question denials of phone hacking ‘out of fear of retaliation’
The Duke of Sussex has said that he did not question denials of phone hacking made by Paul Dacre at the Leveson Inquiry “out of fear of retaliation”.
In his witness statement, Harry said:
I do not see why Associated should get away with something they have covered up and lied about for however many years.
I simply do not understand how I could have discovered that I had these claims against Associated for the unlawful acts I am claiming about any earlier than I did, especially as current senior figures at Associated lied all those years ago, which everyone believed.
I remember Paul Dacre, in particular, clearly stating that phone hacking had not taken place at Associated.
By going on the offensive, rather than the defensive, they had me so convinced that I didn’t even think twice about it, nor did I dare question Paul Dacre out of fear of retaliation.
The advantage they had was that their approach appeared more belligerent than the rest; ‘if you dare take us on, we will destroy your life’ kind of approach. I don’t think it left anyone with any other option other than to believe Associated and accept they must be telling the truth.
In his written evidence, the Duke of Sussex said that the “bubble burst” after he stepped down as a working senior royal in 2020 and moved to North America.
Describing claims against News Group Newspapers (NGN), the publisher of The Sun and the now defunct News Of The World, Harry said:
It was only really within the past few years that I found out that other individuals within or associated with the Institution, such as my friend Marko, had brought phone hacking claims against NGN.
It is not an exaggeration to say that the bubble burst in terms of what I knew in 2020 when I moved out of the United Kingdom.
To this day, there are members of the royal family and friends of mine who may have been targeted by NGN and I have no idea whether they have or have not brought claims.
Harry ‘determined’ to hold publisher accountable
“I am determined to hold Associated accountable, for everyone’s sake,” Harry’s written submission states.
The Duke of Sussex added:
I am therefore committed to pursuing this claim because I believe it is in the public’s interest.
If the defendant, the owner of various national newspapers, including the Daily Mail which, by its own definition, is the most influential and popular newspaper in the UK, can evade justice without there being a trial of my claims then what does that say about the industry as a whole and the consequences for our great country.
In response to a source close to the Duke of Sussex’s claim, who said Associated Newspapers Limited had used “game playing and dirty tricks” to bring forward Harry’s evidence, an Associated Newspapers spokesperson said:
Prince Harry has been in London since the weekend ready to give evidence in this case, which he launched three and half years ago.
We don’t intend to dignify this briefing by the other side with any further comment.
In his written evidence, the Duke of Sussex described a Daily Mail article from 2013, which stated he “faces a lonely New Year’s Eve”, as “creepy”.
He said:
Associated published this article about my relationship with Cressida Bonas, including information about our whereabouts and plans.
The headline speaks to exactly how they wanted me to be: lonely, miserable, depressed.
Again, this article is creepy. Kensington Palace should not be talking about private matters, but just because someone said Cressida’s not coming for Christmas, how did they know she was on Richard Branson’s island?
It’s a horrible existence for a young girl to be stalked like this – they probably tracked Cressida or blagged information about her flight, and would have had her under surveillance like they did my other girlfriends.
Duke of Sussex claims he was ‘forced to perform’ for reporters
Antony White KC, for Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL), asked the Duke of Sussex about phone conversations he had with Rebecca English, now royal editor at the Daily Mail, during which he allegedly thanked her.
Harry said he had no recollection of the calls, but that journalists were people who “we were forced to work with, we had to have some kind of relationship with them”.
He added that he was “forced to perform” for reporters, sometimes at royal engagements, “knowing who they are and knowing full well the kind of stories they had written about me and how they have commercialised my private life”.
Harry, who took notes and occasionally sipped from a bottle of water while giving evidence, also said:
Yes, if there was an opportunity to befriend, through official channels, to be able to say ‘thank you’ or ‘are you ok?’, one would hope that would go a long way.
The duke also said that he thought the job of journalists was to “get stuff out of my friends”, earlier saying: “I am not friends with any of these journalists, and never have been.”
Discussing a Mail On Sunday article from October 2011, Harry said in his written evidence that the information in the story would have only been known by himself, Chelsy Davy and their close friends.
He continued:
It feels creepy, like you’re constantly being watched, and you can’t trust anyone around you.
It feels like every aspect of your life behind closed doors is being displayed to the world for amusement, entertainment and money.
The Duke of Sussex has said he “fundamentally” rejects the suggestion that “any coexisting with anybody means I have no private life”.
Harry also claimed that Paul Dacre, the former editor of the Daily Mail, “has been very good” at claiming that articles were in the public interest, and said Mr Dacre had “turned it into a business model”.
Justice Nicklin then said that witnesses “feel a particular pressure to make their point and to argue the point”, but continued: “You don’t have to do that, you just need to answer the questions.”
Harry responded that Associated Newspapers Ltd “have done a very good job of stripping out all the colour from the situations the claimants have been in”, that he had been under “24-hour surveillance” and that “people write about you claiming it is in the public interest when it clearly isn’t”.
Justice Nicklin said: “The careful balance between the public interest and the interference with privacy rights is one I have spent a career dealing with.”
The Duke of Sussex has claimed it was “beyond cruel” to publish an article about “confidential discussions” he had after a photo of a dying Diana, Princess of Wales was published in the Italian press.
In his written evidence, Harry described an article published in the Daily Mail in July 2006 as “really disgusting”, saying he was having private discussions with his brother, the now-Prince of Wales.
Harry said in his witness statement: “If Associated was willing to publish this type of material, then it really makes me wonder how far they are prepared to go and what else they learnt but never published because they would get caught.
“The amount of information and detail in this article would not have come from Clarence House; they were plainly listening in to calls as well as spending large sums on private investigators.
“To do that is simply shameful but to publish it I feel is beyond cruel and an abuse of journalistic privilege which I find extremely upsetting.”
There “would be a lot more out there” if three people who the Duke of Sussex described as some of his “closest friends” had decided to speak to the press, the High Court has heard.
Antony White KC, for Associated Newspapers Limited, suggested to Harry that comments from the duke of him talking about being in love with Chelsy Davy while at a campfire in Botswana could only have become known to Mail journalists if someone had told them.
Harry said the information was more likely picked up when he “talked about it on a voicemail” or other communication.
He added: “The quote is being attributed to three strangers. You are now trying to suggest that these three strangers are some of my closest friends. That does not add up.”
He continued: “These three people have never shared anything with anybody. If they had, there would be a lot more out there.”
Harr accuses the press of ‘wanting to drive me to drugs to sell papers’
In his written witness statement, Harry makes serious claims against the publisher, all of which it denies.
Harry said the publisher waged “a campaign, an obsession of having every aspect of my life under surveillance so they could get the run on their competitors and drive me paranoid beyond belief, isolating me, and probably wanting to drive me to drugs and drinking to sell more of their papers”
The Duke of Sussex has said in his written evidence that he was “really worried something bad was going to happen” when he was in a relationship with Chelsy Davy.
Describing a surprise visit to Argentina by Davy, Harry said in his written evidence that he “suspected someone had been paid to reveal our plans”.
He continued: “I was never suspicious of Chelsy in relation to stories like this but I was of her friends. If I saw this story at the time, I would have been very frustrated and angry.
“I would have questioned how Associated found out this information. But, at the same time, I would have felt like I had to accept this as the reality of my life.
“This sort of intrusion was terrifying for Chelsy: it made her feel like she was being hunted and the press had caught her and it was terrifying for me too because there was nothing I could do to stop it and now she was in my world.
“She was ‘shaken’ and I was really paranoid about trying to protect our privacy, as the article says.
“Their behaviour and treatment of Chelsy was not normal. I was really worried something bad was going to happen.”
